logo
 Pokrewne IndeksDr Who New Adventures 37 Sanctuary, by DavOn Looking At Photographs DavChildress DavAnara Bella Ready or Not (Samhain) (pdf)260. Brooks Helen Kolacja z byśÂ‚ym szefemDaniel Min (EN) Planetary Awareness TechniqueCzechow Antoni Pojedynek (pdf)Dynastia Kinca265. Dailey Janet śÂšlepa na miśÂ‚ośÂ›ć‡
  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • lafemka.pev.pl



  • [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

    manner.
    ARBUTHNOT: Why then did you accept my invitation?
    169
    170 Newton s Darkness: Two Dramatic Views
    CIBBER: It was a summons& an imposition I generally ignore. What
    brought me here was sheer curiosity& . You wrote that you wanted to
    discuss a play& and that the matter was urgent.
    ARBUTHNOT: It is urgent.
    CIBBER: You did not mention the play s title.
    ARBUTHNOT: And now you know.
    CIBBER: So you saw it?
    ARBUTHNOT: Last night.
    CIBBER: The sixth performance& and still a full house.
    ARBUTHNOT: A mob flocking into the theatre sheds little light on a
    play s quality& or veracity.
    CIBBER: Since when is veracity on stage judged a virtue?
    ARBUTHNOT: When it is not used to hide distortion.
    CIBBER: Ours was applauded& your Three Hours after Marriage was
    hissed. Yours was virtually stillborn in 1717 and did not make it past the
    second performance. I know of no revival.
    ARBUTHNOT: That is hitting below the belt.
    CIBBER: Whose belt? John Gay s, Alexander Pope s, or yours?
    (Scornfully) Requiring three cooks for a thin theatrical pudding& meant
    to contain wit but in the end not tasting of wit at all. (Short sarcastic
    laugh) Asking the actors to do a good job while burdened with a bad
    script& meaning they had to be good at being bad!
    ARBUTHNOT: Much too clever& and thus not worth recapture.
    You re more likely to be remembered for your sharper pen than for your
    tongue.
    CIBBER: (Prickly) How so?
    ARBUTHNOT: You had the audacity& some even called it
    impertinence& to adapt Richard III, but you added a line&  Off with
    Calculus: Act 2, Scene 10 171
    his head& so much for Buckingham & that I wager will be remembered
    longer than all the words you ever spoke on stage.
    CIBBER: Is this a compliment or an affront?
    ARBUTHNOT: The choice is yours! It is Calculus I wish to address& a
    true affront. Is a stage the place to wash dirty linen in public?
    CIBBER: So we re back at veracity! Where else do such laundry? The
    stage is the only place where nothing need be hidden.
    ARBUTHNOT: A country requires heroes
    CIBBER: (Sarcastic) Pray offer an example.
    ARBUTHNOT: Take Marlborough.
    CIBBER: A military hero, that I grant you. And awarded Blenheim
    Palace by a grateful sovereign and nation. But does that mean that John
    Vanbrugh the architect of Blenheim must also build a palace a
    dramatic one for Newton?
    ARBUTHNOT: We need unsullied heroes& and not just military ones.
    What purpose is served by showing that England s greatest natural
    philosopher is flawed& like other mortals? Consider the laws of motion
    and of gravitation& of light and color& his work on celestial
    mechanics. Calculus was not needed for any of them. Even without the
    calculus, Newton would be our greatest.
    CIBBER: Greatest natural philosopher& or paragon of probity? Why
    not take him for what he was: a tainted hero. Inventor of the calculus?
    Yes! But also corruptor of a moral calculus. And what about Leibniz&
    does he not deserve some defense?
    ARBUTHNOT: Let that be the concern of the Germans.
    CIBBER: Our Newton rests in Westminster Abbey under a hero s
    monument. But whatever their tomb, both continue to rot.
    ARBUTHNOT: A medical or another moral judgment?
    CIBBER: (Conciliatory) As you are a doctor, let it be medical. We ve
    wrangled enough. (Pause) Poor Leibniz. The only person on the
    172 Newton s Darkness: Two Dramatic Views
    Committee who could have defended him was a Swiss& and from
    Geneva at that!
    ARBUTHNOT: Bonet. (Reflects) He had the least to lose... and thus lost
    the most.
    CIBBER: You think Vanbrugh should have dealt with him more kindly?
    ARBUTHNOT: Sir John is dead.
    CIBBER: Sir John created the setting, he chose the characters, he dug up
    the dirt, and he spread it around. I only helped with broom and shovel&
    except for the very end. At his deathbed, Sir John asked me to complete
    the play& even offering me the epigraph: frango ut patefaciam.
    ARBUTHNOT:  I break in order to reveal.
    CIBBER: (Nodding) Your Latin is faultless. I acceded& with some
    reservation. The play was meant as revenge& though revenge, like love,
    is rarely consummated by surrogates. Yet directing retribution at the [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • aureola.keep.pl